The Climate Narrative Is Cracking
Three articles that dominated Irrational Fear this month
This month was massive.
For the first time in years, the regulatory foundation of the climate narrative is starting to crack.
The 2009 Endangerment Finding, the rule that allowed the federal government to regulate carbon dioxide as a dangerous pollutant, is now under serious scrutiny.
And something interesting has been happening along the way.
More and more of the people inside government, policy, and regulatory circles are reading my work at IrrationalFear.com.
Staffers. Analysts. Advisors.
The same people who are now questioning the assumptions behind decades of climate regulation.
Judging by the traffic this month, the conversation is growing fast.
These were the three most-read articles on Irrational Fear this month:
1. What Is the Correct CO₂ Concentration?
If CO₂ is truly a pollutant, there should be a clear scientific threshold where it becomes dangerous. When you actually examine geology, plant physiology, and climate history, that threshold is far less obvious than the policy narrative suggests.
2. The Endangerment Finding Was Pre-Cooked
A deep dive into how the legal foundation for regulating carbon dioxide was built—and why the scientific assumptions behind it deserve serious scrutiny.
3. Can We Really Trust the Global Temperature Record?
Nearly every climate claim depends on a single metric: global average temperature. This article explores how that number is constructed, adjusted, and sometimes reshaped over time.
These articles are just the beginning.
Over the past few years, I’ve written more than 435 original pieces examining:
• climate science
• energy policy
• disaster data
• regulatory overreach
• and the assumptions driving the climate narrative
Most of the articles include free sections, but subscribers get the deeper analysis, figures, and data that the public conversation rarely touches.
And a subscription costs less than a cup of coffee each month.
If you want to understand what’s really happening as the climate narrative collides with data, law, and reality…
Subscribe here:
Over 435 articles.
Independent analysis.
No institutional filter.
The narrative is changing.
And more people are starting to notice.